National ID cards in the UK: Debates For and Against

topic ID fliers in the UK Debates For and AgainstIntroducing National ID rallys in the United Kingdom.The concept of this turning away to inscribe National ID card in the UK, is so that any legal citizen of the United Kingdom should be able to confirm their identity simply by producing this card and at that placefore prove their right to be within the UK without argument. It will do this by holding enough in-person data to specifically identify a person as the individual they are cl involveing to be without question.You may wonder why the Government chance this a necessary action and it awaits the main aim of this scheme is that the National ID card is ultimately mean to assist with law enforcement predominantly in analogy to terrorism and organised crime. One of the main criteria for this scheme therefore, is that the card game should not be easily forged so that any iodine wishing to flout the law could do so easily.These separate are only intended to hold basic data a bout a person, only enough to prove their identity. However it seems the definition of this basic data seems somewhat ambiguous. Primarily, for example, it is intended that the card will only hold information regarding a persons name, address, date of birth and address etc. Scratch the surface however, and it seems that the actual proposal for the ID card embraces practically more technologically sophisticated designs because, as previously stated, it aims to avoid being easily forged. Therefore it is intended that it will also hold biometric data, that is to say, data that proves a much more visible individuality, such as fingermark impressions or iris scans. It will do this through implementing the opportunities now made available to us through the ever advancing forms of ICT (Information and Communication Technology).All this in mind it seems the introduction of National ID cards within the United Kingdom seems to be one of the most politically sensitive topics around at this incumbent moment, with people arguing both in assert and opposition of the scheme, regarding whether it will protect or control us.In the aftermath of September the 11th we had perhaps become more aware than we had been previously, that we were vulnerable to attack from Terrorists who despised the Western Capitalist conclusion such as that which exists both within the UK and America where the attack took place. It was a shock to thousands, if not millions of us all over the world, as we were humbled to find oneself the devastation that this attack, and attacks like it can cause. For those in support of the National ID card, they claim that terrorist attacks would mean that it would be much more problematic for a terrorist trying to take up a plan via an assumed false identity because of the designs previously outlined. The idea is that the authorities would question them too vigorously once they inevitably failed to produce a valid ID card, and therefore be obstruct their terror ist strategies. Indeed one of the most adamant supporters of this argument is Mr David Blunkett who is quoted as sayingThe ability to prove ones identity dependably is an ever-more important aspect of modern life. (www.publictechnology.net/modules)Indeed Mr Blunketts perspective on this issue is that it represents the answer to our living in fear of attack, as the cards are proposed to be so technologically advanced they will be impossible to forge. Whether this is a valid claim remains to be seen.In addition, the scheme is also seen as a solution to serious and organised crime with the UK and also seemingly much more everyday issues such assisting in the efficiency of public services. Bases weighty techniques on the basis that those with nothing to hide will only benefit.From this we can see both what the National ID card is intended to be, and why the Government in the main, support this scheme, particularly in light of the War Against Terrorism. However as previously mentioned, the National ID card scheme is a sensitive current affair and does seem to be becoming an increasing Political Hot Potato with concerns raising particularly in relation to our Human Right to concealing and how these may possibly be infringed upon by advancing forms of ICT. Even though a person may have nothing to hide they may feel that the schemes enforces extra control over them rather than protecting them. Despite assurances from the Government that only very basic data will be held on these cards and that only the Government and ourselves (subject to the Data Protection Act 1998) will have a right to access the information, we are aware that in order to assimilate these cards practically impossible to forge the link has to be made between sophisticated forms of ICT in order to incorporate features such iris scans and fingerprint impressions etc. As a consequence of this, the use of modern technology seems to have caused panic through an idea that we will become a ball club un der the constant supervision of Big Brother and that everyone could potentially know our business. In short, there is an opposition to the National ID card as it is suggested it will stupor upon our civil rights to privacy, and that rather than the scheme being one to protect us, it would ultimately become one to control us in perhaps what could be identify as a communist trait and therefore undermine the very grammatical construction of our current Capitalist society.Indeed an entire website named say No2ID and the Database State is base on the very foundation of this argument. In comparison to the Governments web foliate (www.identitycards.gov.uk) of frequently asked questions, which only briefly touches on the issue. Notably only one question on this page related to ICT specifically and that didnt really address the concern of ICT exposing our business, rather it related only to defining biometric dataA biometric is a unique identifying physical characteristic. Examples includ e facial recognition, iris patterns and fingerprints.( www.identitycards.gov.uk)Basically it would seem that those in oppostion tend to be in fear because the design of the cards is intended to be so advanced that most of us will not be able to fully understand the extent to which we are monitored by this scheme. In essence there seems to be an almost operantly conditioned response amongst the opposition, based on previous experience that our pitying rights will be sacrificed against our will and thus demolish the UKs characteristic liberal approach to civil rights and its Capitalist structure.For example, as recently as the 27th November 2005 it was revealed by the Mail on Sunday that the database for the Driver fomite and Licensing Agency (DVLA) is actually profiting by selling our data to would be wheel clampers. The scenario being that for a small fee, car park attendants and wheel clampers could forward bills to motorists kinsfolk addresses because they were provided with t hem by the DVLA. Indeed the DVLA were exposed as even allowing one wheel clamping company to purchase the information (for as little as 2.50 per transaction) whose two bosses were actually already in prison for crimes of extorting money from the Motorist.From this we can see that even when respected organisations such as the DVLA are allowed to hold personal data on us we can sometimes be exploited in the pursuit of profit and therefore we can perhaps begin to understand the concerns arising over the National ID card.All this in mind, it is perhaps now relevant to apply this knowledge in order to assess how the scheme will affect the current structure of society within the UK.As a quick overview the UK exists as a Capitalist Society, which thrives on a democratic government and allows us our civil human rights such as the right to privacy. This would seem quite a positive description, especially in light of how civil rights have so vehemently been fought for in the past, particularl y in relation to the movement to support the rights of black people that took place in America during the 1960s. Indeed it is important to acknowledge that both those who support and oppose the scheme do so because they are fearful for the survival of that political societal structure, despite the extremities of approach to the topic i.e., 1. by believing the cards will protect us, or 2) that they will to undermine us.For those in support of the National ID card, it is perhaps a representation of reformism. Meaning that it seems to be an example of a Political Policy whose object is to modify a political practice or aspect of kind legislation without changing the fundamental political social structure. (Jary D Jary J, 1999) Yet for those in opposition that is not the case and the National ID would in position change the fundamental political social structure. If as suggested by those in opposition to the scheme that we will become a database state sure we are changing the fundam ental political structure of our society as we seem to be relinquishing a great deal of our privacy in order to accommodate such concepts. The concern is that we may perhaps pause walk our way over to a more politically left / socialist standpoint and therefore sacrifice our Capitalist structure which arguably at this point in time defines the UK. If this is the case wherefore we could perhaps argue that the decision to defend ourselves against terrorists would in fact actually leave behind in us allowing the terrorists to win, as the Capitalist structure would in fact wither naturally.One of the most prevalent characteristics of society within the United Kingdom is surely that of Capitalism, and then one of the main reasons we are vulnerable to terrorist attacks by organisations like Al-Qaeda who oppose it. Whilst there are variations to the definitions of Capitalism as it is notoriously difficult to define, it would seem that the rejection of centralised control is one of the most prevalent motivations of a Capitalist structure. If we were to take on board those, for example who adamantly profess to say No2ID, then we would arguably be acting in the interest on maintaining our social structure of a Capitalist state as they are rejecting avenues for an influx of databases that may ultimately result in a society which will exist via centralised control in this case through the medium of databases. Whats attached providing babies with barcodes?What makes this topic so complex henceforth is that those who are on the other of the fence and support scheme such as Mr Blunkett are in fact motivated by this very same desire to preserve and protect our Capitalist state, and so it seems that this is one of the rare political topics that actually where the aim is actually agreed upon by the majority of the nation even if the method is disputed.As alluded to earlier all sorts of arguments exist in relation to the ID card and specifically the push ICT. We might feel that we could be blinded by science and exploited. We might also be justified in feeling that our personal privacy would be exploited by corrupt people in power (as is alleged to have happened via the DVLA), however it is also felt a necessary ploy in order to avoid counterfeit duplication. All possibly valid arguments, however, what hasnt been discussed is the actual practical application of this scheme. If, we were to embrace Mr Blunketts main reasoning for the scheme, then surely Police would be encouraged to stereotype and stop those who they felt could possibly be terrorists. In light of the threat from Al-Qaeda this is surely likely to result in a cultural divide, as they would likely stop Asian people thought to dominate the Islamic religion, rather than white people. In relation to the topic of the Civil Rights movement, mentioned earlier, we would arguably be promoting a shift back towards racism. Since the UK is a place that manages to embrace aspects of Liberalism (a con cept which promotes such tolerance of religion and personal and economic freedom) without challenging the Capitalism in society, the introduction of the ID card would arguably be a backlash against such positive traits and be quite disappointing.Whether in support of the ID card or in extreme opposition, it does seem that it is inevitable as talks persist and plans continue. It would seem that both sides of this argument have a substantial weight to them. However, change and diversity within society is surely inevitable. Its surely what defines our history and characterises our culture. For the UK, it would seem that the National ID card will be one of those most significant changes to occur in the next few years. Yet surely it is better to evolve than remain in a noneffervescent culture otherwise we would never advance. Surely a risk is worth taking even if we are not always in agreement or sure of the consequences.BibliographyCushing, S (2001) Information and Communication Techno logy London Letts EducationalDonnellan, C (2004) Protecting Our Privacy Cambridge MWL Print GroupJary, D Jary, J. (1999) Sociology Leicester HarperCollins PublishersWebsiteswww.identitycards.gov.ukhttp//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3568468.stmwww.news-from-newspapers.com/en/Wikipedia.org/2005/04/21/Capitalism.htmlhttp//www.no2id.net/www.publictechnology.net/modules)http//www.spy.org.uk/spyblog/2005/11/ (Mail on Sunday 27th November 2005)http//www.timesonline.co.uk

The Lying Witches and the Downfall of Shakespeares Macbeth :: GCSE English Literature Coursework

Lying Witches and the Downfall of Macbeth A false state workforcet or a statement intended to lead astray someone is known as a lie. Of course, there are many different types of lies. There are those blatant lies that have no truth in them whatsoever, lies of omission, and half-truths. In the Shakespearean play, Macbeth, evil witches deceive their victim, Macbeth, by telling him half-truths ab bring out his prophecies. As a result of this new half-true knowledge, Macbeth makes rash decisions that lead him to paranoia, grief, and eventually his downfall. The prime(prenominal) set of prophecies that the witches reveal to Macbeth in act 1, scene 3, stated that Macbeth was to become Thane of Glamis, Thane of Cawdor and finally be crowned king. They also said, Thou shalt get kings, g-forcegh thou be none. Macbeth was shocked when the first two prophecies came true. In act 1, scene 3, he spoke of his fears, saying unfix my hair, and make my seated lookt knock at my ribs. In Eliz abethan times, witches were known as creatures of the devil, satanic creatures who roam the world to cause destruction and chaos. But how could devils speak of great truths? Macbeths new knowledge was because reported to his wife. He writes about how he will become king. But how would he do this? One of Macbeths rash decisions was to murder the present King. Macbeth had invited the King and the Kings men to his castle to celebrate the victory of the battle that had been won. That night, while everyone was asleep, Macbeth took a dagger and killed the King. After the murder he became very paranoid. In act 2, scene 2, he cries Didst thou not hear a noise? ...Theres one did laugh ins sleep, and one cried murder, Methought I heard a voice cry sopor no more Macbeth does murder sleep...I am afraid to think what I have done look ont again I dare not. Macbeth become king. As a result of his Paranoia, he called upon murderers to execute Banquo, a friend of his that knew about the prophe cies. Paranoia had taken over his life so much that his wife was left out of his plans. He had become so paranoid, his feelings had become numb. This is shown in act 5, scene 5, when he says I have almost forgot the taste of fears The time has been, my senses would have coold to hear a night-shriek.

The Development of the American Conservation Movement Essay examples --

The Development of the American Conservation Movement whoremonger Muir helped the cultivation of the American conservation movement during the late nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. The creation of the National commons Service, the creation of several major national third estates, including Yosemite National Park and the creation of the Sierra Club were all because of fanny Muir. In the late nineteenth century America was in a stage of expansion and economical development that used as well as threatened much of the natural world. Much of the economic development was in the form of industrialization that took its cost of the environment with both(prenominal) its consumption of natural resources as well pollution. This expansion and economic development had adverse consequences on the environment of the United States. During this time of development many became aw ar of the damage being done to the natural world and attempted to prevent or limit this damage being done. It is during this time of both industrialization and spiritual awakening that the conservation movement arose with one of its most famous activists, John Muir. John Muir believed that for the future of America that the natural world should be protected. Muir felt that the environment of much of the United States was not protected properly and the locations that were protected were not managed adequately. Muir felt that Americans had much to gain from the protection of their national resources and park lands. In John Muirs book Our National Parks, written in 1901 he states Awakening from the stupefying effects of the vice of over-industry and the deadly apathy of luxury, they are trying as best they can to mix and enrich their own... .... The conservation movement had grown and spread as a result of the industrialization of America. John Muir became a leader of this movement to protect the natural world for all generations. His outspoken actions were major influences in the protection of many national parks as well as the formal arrangement of the National Park System which today still protects our natural world. i John Muir, Our National Parks. ( Boston, New York Houghton Milffin Company, 1901)pg.1.2 John Muir, My First Summer in the Sierras. ( Boston, New York Hougnton, Milffin Company, 1911)pg,138.3 Henry Thoreau, Excursions. (Boston Ticker and Fields, 1863)pg.41.4 Gifford Pinchot. The Fight for Conservation.(New York Doubleday,Page and Company, 1910) Summary5 John Muir, My First Summer in the Sierras. ( Boston, New York Houghton, Milffin Company, 1911)pg.196.

Milton Rogovin :: essays research papers

When I took this class I came in with no knowledge of photography. To me settings were just a piece of film from the past. I never appreciated photography until I entered this class and viewed the pictures from the book and visited the New York Historical Society with photographs from Milton Rogovin. His exhibition truly surprised me. When I heard about this trip I ruling it was going to be another museum visit. The second I entered his exhibition I see a huge wall with two multitude dancing the trance. That picture rattling started my trip positively. As I started to look around I noticed that all of his pictures were of flock. Every picture had sadness to it. These photographs in reality touched me. They separately have their own story to tell. In the beginning I was wondering why Rogovin took photographs like that but until later I realized what his point was. These people were all from lower classes. No one ever pays attention to poor people and these photographs really m ade these people feel like they were worth something. Rogovin give tongue to that these were the neglected people and places of Buffalo, NY. When I saw these pictures it seemed so real and natural. Rogovin did not have to do much to make these photographs mean something because automatically I felt up something for these people just by looking at their faces. There were pictures of mothers with children, fathers with sons, friends with friends. Rogovin loved to see people grow through his pictures. He loved the way animateness could change so drastically in such a little time. He had a lot of photos that consisted of more than two sets. They all started off with the people being young and ending with them grown up. It was like a story of their life in just a couple of photographs. His work is amazing and it really did bring light to these people. It was very difficult to choose one photograph since I admired all of them and they all were touching pictures. But the one that really touched me was photo 16.This set consisted of four photos. It was a mother with her daughter and it ranged from years 1972-2001. I first looked at this picture without reading the story or listening to the summary. I wanted to compare my view to what was actually happening.

Legalization of Marijuana :: Argumentative, Marijuana Legalization

The legalization of cannabis has been questionable for many many years now, but the governing body respectable seems to always decline. I feel that marijuana should be legalized. There are many reasons for and against legalization, but the arguments for it outweigh the arguments against it. I believe marijuana should be legalized for ternion main reasons. Legalization will bring in much needed tax dollars, it will free up prisons and their resources, and it will save the U.S tons of money. If marijuana is legalized, it can be taxed by the federal government, like alcohol and cigarettes are now. If this is done, not only will the government save millions of dollars on searching for marijuana, the government will make billions of dollars off the sale of marijuana which can be used for drug education programs to help educate the youth of America. In the fall in States, all levels of government (federal, state, and local authorities) participate in the War on Drugs. We currently spend billions of dollars every year to chase peaceful people who reach to like to get high. These people get locked up in prison and the taxpayers have to foot the bill. We have to pay for food, housing, health care, attorney fees, court costs, and another(prenominal) expenses to lock these people up. This is extremely expensive If you must know, it costs taxpayers like you and me $42,000 a year to keep just one criminal in jail. Thats more than than twice the amount citizens spend on sending their children to school. Taxpayers only spend a dissapointing $13,000 a year for public schooling. We could save billions of dollars every year as a nation if we stop wasting money locking people up for having marijuana. In addition, if marijuana were legal, the government would be able to collect taxes on it, and would have a lot more money to pay for effective drug education programs and other important causes. According to The Report of the Task withdraw on Cannabis Regulation to t he Center for the Study of Drug Policy, marijuana is one of the largest tax-exempt industries in the country today. 10-15 billion dollars a year could be made simply by legalizing cannabis. Hemp, the nonpsychoactive version of the plant, has many, many uses but is outlawed by the U.S. government. Hemp is an incredibly strong fiber that can be used for ropes, clothes and